Projects and delivery experience
Explore language and AI data projects, the work delivered and the conditions that shaped each result.
Selected projects
See what each project involved, what we delivered and the results.
Delivered volumes, by data type
Completed work across AI data programmes since 2015, not capacity estimates. Every engagement is covered by its own agreement, so totals are shown without naming clients. Ask for the modality closest to your programme and we will walk you through how that work was scoped, reviewed, and accepted.
Modality figures from founder records dated 15 August and 4 October 2026. Speech and audio are reported data-program hours; annotation, labelling and segmentation records may overlap and are not added to these figures.
Services and further reading
Case studies
See what language and AI data projects involved, what we delivered and the results.
Open case studiesBuyer guides
Know what to ask about data security, language coverage, reviewers and quality checks.
Open buyer guidesServices
Find services for translation, localization, interpreting, media and AI data.
Open servicesPeople and platform
The platform
See how work is assigned, reviewed and prepared for delivery. Ask us to demonstrate the steps for your project.
Explore the platformThe specialist network
MoniSa maintains a combined network of 110,000+ native linguists and AI data contributors · Founder-reported combined network · 4 Oct 2026. Company-wide coverage includes rare, indigenous and low-resource languages; availability is checked for each project.
Explore the networkCompany-wide language coverage
Availability and specialist fit are confirmed for each project.
110,000+
native linguists and AI data contributors
Founder-reported combined network · 4 Oct 2026
300+
languages across active service lines
4,500+
dialects and regional variants
1,000+
organizations served since 2015
Proof questions
What should count as proof when evaluating a language vendor?
Work matching your content type, language difficulty, and outcome — documented with the scope, the constraint, and the result. Aggregate volume is not proof: total words delivered says nothing about whether a vendor has handled a problem like yours.
Why are client logos not used as proof here?
A logo shows a relationship existed. It says nothing about what was delivered or how it went, and confidentiality terms usually prohibit displaying it anyway. Documented cases stating scope, constraint, and result carry more information and can be interrogated, which a logo wall cannot.
How can a buyer verify a vendor’s claims before signing?
Ask for the claim’s unit and scope — what the number counts, over what period, for what kind of work — and for a documented case where the same claim held. A claim that cannot be restated precisely enough to check is not one to rely on.
Tell us about your project
Include your language pairs, content type, volume, deadline and review requirements.
Send a brief