Projects and delivery experience.

Explore language and AI data projects, the work delivered and the conditions that shaped each result.

Delivered volume

Delivered volumes, by data type.

Completed work across AI data programmes since 2015, not capacity estimates. Every engagement is covered by its own agreement, so totals are shown without naming clients. Ask for the modality closest to your programme and we will walk you through how that work was scoped, reviewed, and accepted.

185,000+ hours Speech data · reported across data programs
175,000+ hours Audio data · reported across data programs
95,000+ hours equivalent Video collection
130,000+ images Image collection
140,000+ samples Text collection
95,000+ documents OCR and document AI · processed and validated
120,000+ contributions Crowdsourced collection
220,000+ prompts Multimodal and LLM data · created, validated, rated and categorised

Modality figures from founder records dated 15 August and 4 October 2026. Speech and audio are reported data-program hours; annotation, labelling and segmentation records may overlap and are not added to these figures.

Services and further reading

People and platform

Company-wide language coverage

Availability and specialist fit are confirmed for each project.

110,000+ native linguists and AI data contributors · Founder-reported combined network · 4 Oct 2026
300+ languages across active service lines
4,500+ dialects and regional variants
110+ rare, indigenous and low-resource languages
1,000+ organizations served since 2015

Buyer questions

Common questions.

What should count as proof when evaluating a language vendor?

Work matching your content type, language difficulty, and outcome — documented with the scope, the constraint, and the result. Aggregate volume is not proof: total words delivered says nothing about whether a vendor has handled a problem like yours.

Why are client logos not used as proof here?

A logo shows a relationship existed. It says nothing about what was delivered or how it went, and confidentiality terms usually prohibit displaying it anyway. Documented cases stating scope, constraint, and result carry more information and can be interrogated, which a logo wall cannot.

How can a buyer verify a vendor’s claims before signing?

Ask for the claim’s unit and scope — what the number counts, over what period, for what kind of work — and for a documented case where the same claim held. A claim that cannot be restated precisely enough to check is not one to rely on.

What happens if you cannot staff one of my language pairs?

For the proposed project, ask for pair-by-pair availability or a recruitment window in writing before agreeing a date. Define qualification and pilot approval for any new contributor before live work. A coverage claim should be checkable before the scope is signed.

Next step

Tell us about your project.

Share the languages, content, volume and deadline. Include any review or security requirements.

Send a brief

Do not paste raw outputs, source records, transcripts, third-party personal data or confidential files here. We will agree a transfer path after scoping.

Required. We will reply about your project.

Scope a project Call