Resources

Buyer guides, field notes, and case evidence in one place.

Start with practical guides, field notes, and proof paths that help a team judge review depth, language readiness, security, and launch risk before sending a brief.

About this page

Built for AI/ML, LSP, and media buying committees.

300+ languages

1,000+ organizations served since 2015 across AI data, translation, localization, media, and interpretation.

1,000+ organizations served · 300+ languages · 4,500+ dialects

Resource paths

Pick the question your buying committee is trying to answer.

Each path keeps the evidence close to the buyer decision: vendor fit, review model, risk, security, or proof.

Buyer guides: LLM output evaluation using an MQM error-typology board and document-level error markup.

Buyer guides

Longer vendor-evaluation playbooks for annotation, interpretation, multimedia, and rare-language translation.

Open buyer guides
Field notes: Choosing a translation QA model with TMS and review tooling.

Field notes

Short operating reads on QA, rare-language sourcing, AI data review, media QC, and regulated content.

Open field notes
Case evidence: Annotation workflow with tool-version, manual-version, file-check, and exception-tracker controls.

Case evidence

case evidence records by challenge, response, outcome, and delivery constraint.

Open case evidence

case evidence

Projects relevant to your work.

See what each project involved, what we delivered and the results.

Recognise your own project in one of these?

Send the language list and volume

Buyer questions

Common questions.

Who are these buyer guides written for?

People responsible for choosing and running a language or AI-data vendor — procurement, localization, and AI programme owners — rather than for linguists. They cover what to ask, what to verify, and where programmes quietly fail, not how translation is performed.

How is a buyer guide different from a service page?

A service page describes what a vendor sells. A buyer guide describes how to evaluate anyone selling it, including the questions that are inconvenient to answer. They exist for different moments: one for when you know what you want, the other for when you are still deciding.

Can these guides be used to evaluate other vendors?

Yes — they are written to be vendor-neutral wherever the subject allows it. The checks that expose a weak language programme are the same whoever runs it, and a buyer who applies them consistently gets a comparable answer from everyone asked.

What happens if you cannot staff one of my language pairs?

For the proposed project, ask for pair-by-pair availability or a recruitment window in writing before agreeing a date. Define qualification and pilot approval for any new contributor before live work. A coverage claim should be checkable before the scope is signed.

Next step

Tell us about your project.

Share the languages, content, volume and deadline. Include any review or security requirements.

Send a brief

Do not paste raw outputs, source records, transcripts, third-party personal data or confidential files here. We will agree a transfer path after scoping.

Required. We will use these details to respond to your request. Privacy policy.

Start a project Call