Regional coverage
South Asia
Afghanistan · Bangladesh · Bhutan · India- Balochi
- Bhojpuri
- Chittagonian
Language coverage
MoniSa works across 300+ languages and 4,500+ dialects, with documented experience across 110+ rare and indigenous language pairs.
Languages in active coverage include Amharic, Bhojpuri, Burmese, Chamorro, Guarani, Haitian Creole, Hmong, Igbo, Khmer, Lao, Nahuatl, and Navajo.
Coverage method
Examples with proof behind them Language coverage is checked by sourcing path, dialect fit, script fit, reviewer availability, and timeline.Coverage view
A language is in coverage when its script, its reference material and its reviewers are already in the building — not when it appears on a list.
Reference material in a different writing system for each language we take work in. A language enters coverage when its material, its conventions and its reviewers already exist here.
Coverage is confirmed pair by pair against script, dialect and reviewer availability. A row that cannot be staffed to the standard does not become a yes because the rest of the sheet is green.
Global coverage
Coverage spans 300+ languages and 4,500+ dialects, run as language pods with native reviewers, senior review, and escalation built into each language path — so reach turns into accountable capacity.
Language, dialect, and specialist-network figures show MoniSa's current buyer-facing coverage baseline.
Rare-language coverage
Language claims stay scoped. These examples are not a universal guarantee that every language is ready for every timeline.
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Regional coverage
Full coverage list
Find yours below. Availability for a specific pair, dialect, and deadline is confirmed against your brief before scheduling.
538 listed
case evidence
Each record keeps the useful detail: the challenge, what we did, the quality controls, and the scoped outcome.
The challenge. A global technology buyer needed rare-language translation, editing, and proofreading at a speed that a normal vendor bench could not absorb.
What we did. MoniSa activated language pods, separated script-specific QA, and staged production in parallel batches with senior review.
The result. The buyer received sprint-speed rare-language capacity with project-scoped quality review and a controlled correction lane.
Recognise your own project in one of these?
Send the language list and volumeProblem. A technology company needed evaluation work in languages where qualified translator pools can be extremely small.
Action. MoniSa assigned separate evaluation reviewers, built contingency backup per language, and tracked delivery by language cluster.
Result. The evaluation set moved through controlled delivery with language-specific backup coverage.
Problem. An AI company needed transcription, labeling, and segmentation across languages with limited existing resource pools.
Action. MoniSa combined in-country sourcing, peer review, senior review, and rolling monthly batches.
Result. The client received multilingual audio data batches measured against its own benchmark set and acceptance notes.
Problem. AI platforms needed language-aware safety evaluation across many pairs where cultural harm and bias do not read the same way.
Action. MoniSa deployed evaluator cohorts, calibration sets, and drift checks across rolling rating batches.
Result. The client received multilingual safety data that engineering teams could use to refine model behavior.
Problem. A streaming team needed subtitle, dubbing, and metadata work to land for a fixed release window.
Action. MoniSa ran parallel language pods with timing QC, linguistic review, and metadata checks before client handoff.
Result. The release package moved through timing, language, and metadata checks before client review.
Buyer questions
The questions buyers send before a scope conversation, answered on the page rather than in a meeting. Take them to your team, then send us the one we did not answer.
On its own, very little. A list entry can mean a qualified specialist is available this week, or that one could be recruited given time. The distinction only bites when you have a deadline, which is why the coverage position for a specific pair should be confirmed in writing before contracting rather than inferred from a list.
Because for many languages the written standard and the variety the audience actually speaks diverge sharply, and choosing the wrong one produces text that is technically correct and practically unusable. MoniSa reports coverage across 300+ languages and 4,500+ dialects for that reason: the dialect is a deliverable decision, not a detail.
Yes, mainly in sequencing. Common pairs are a scheduling problem; rare pairs are an availability problem. So feasibility is checked first and the timeline is built around when a qualified specialist can start, instead of fitting the specialist into a date already committed.
For the proposed project, ask for pair-by-pair availability or a recruitment window in writing before agreeing a date. Define qualification and pilot approval for any new contributor before live work. A coverage claim should be checkable before the scope is signed.
Next step
A useful brief names the language, content, deadline, review depth, and proof the buying team needs.
Send a brief