| What exact source language, output language, variety and script does the work require? # |
Source and output sides written separately, including regional variety and script where they affect the task. |
Whether a broad language label is hiding a combination the supplier has not covered. |
| What role must the person perform in that combination? # |
Collection, transcription, translation, review, evaluation, interpreting direction, or another named task. |
Whether fluency is being mistaken for task competence. |
| How will the required variety or accent distinction be tested? # |
A task that makes the distinction visible and a qualified person who judges the result. |
Whether the supplier can demonstrate the distinction rather than simply claim familiarity. |
| What evidence supports this exact combination? # |
The relevant test, sample or record in the Supplier Evidence Matrix, linked to the same role and task. |
Whether the evidence belongs to this line or to a different capability claim. |
| Has the person or team been validated, and are they actually available? # |
Validation and current availability answered separately, with any conditions still open. |
Whether "approved" has been mistaken for ready to deploy. |
| What capacity is credible for this combination and period? # |
Capacity tied to the exact role, operating conditions, confirmed availability, and the point when it must be checked again. |
Whether the number can support a plan or is only an estimate. |
| Who is primary, who is backup, and what would make either one active? # |
The designation, current availability, remaining onboarding or access, and the decision needed to assign the work. |
Whether continuity exists beyond one suitable person. |
| What happens if the combination cannot be staffed as requested? # |
The buyer’s choice to change timing, role, variety, scope, or supplier, made before delivery is promised. |
Whether the coverage decision has an honest fallback rather than a forced yes. |